I take very little in the Game as mere happenstance.
This post will illustrate just that, and just how I capitalize off of every opening by interpreting everything the girl does as an IOI: a sign that the girl wants to fuck me.
For the many new subscribers to this awesomely wicked blog of mines, those who aren’t in the loop as far as my whereabouts on the globe, I am currently located in the Caribbean islands, and have been somewhat full time, over the last 4 years [originally a New Yorker].
Here on island, some days ago, a tragic incident occurred between a young couple, where the male had slain his girlfriend (by stabbing) during an altercation. The details are still very sketchy. All that is known is that the girl got killed subsequent the altercation.
Upon news of this, ton loads of women on island took to social media spewing anti-men diatribe: “all men are potential murderous subhumans”. Quasi-Feminist groups popping up out the woodworks demanding the head of this individual on a silver platter.
The death penalty had been outlawed here some time ago. But these Feminists have been picketing the government to reinstate the capitol punishment, even just for this case alone!
Most men being feminized pussies to begin with, concur with the outraged women, agreeing that all men are evil subhumans who should be castrated and left for dead.
No surprise there; I was virtually the sole male on social media pushing back against this “all men are wicked subhumans” rhetoric. And for it, I caught tremendous amount of heat as you would’ve expected, from both males and females.
My argument wasn’t that the boyfriend who’d slain his girlfriend should be given a slap on the wrist. My push back was merely against male-bashing, and jumping to outlandish conclusions before any shred of fact was brought to the table.
That is actually the common sense approach rather than an emotional one.
In any case, and as usual, I took the proverbial arrows for team males, while every other so-called man on every post about the incident I commented, was lambasting me while agreeing with the male-bashing by angered women.
Now, I touched on the root cause of this the other day (even on social media), “why do men throw other men under the bus for women”?
The answers to that are simple: appeasement, ass-kissing and sissification.
Most men- the vast majority- are under the delusion that agreeing with women and fem-centric causes (be they male-bashing), will facilitate their sexual advances and chances with the women with whom they find accord.
This is so far from reality that it is absolutely laughable.
Guys who think this way are actually your quintessential and self-professed “nice guys”. Yet, as I pointed out over the years, these quote-unquote “nice guys” are actually the manipulative scumbags who are trying to trick women into liking them, into bed and into relationships.
However, these so-called nice guys hold the opinion that Pick-Up Artists are the manipulative scums who trick women into everything under the sun! But nice guys are the manipulators of women, hence they go out of their way to falsely concur with everything women say and do, in hopes of getting some pussy…which never ever happens because of that by the way.
On the contrary, what these males with vaginas don’t seem to understand is that women are NOT attracted to followers, neither men who stridently and constantly agree with them, men who suck up to women, men who don’t hold their ground nor men who don’t hold opinions of their own.
Plainly: women don’t like pussies!!!
These Beta-Males don’t get that! They do not understand how women operate!
The only use that women have for patsies and ass-kissing men, is to get their daily fix and hit off the validation crack pipe. If they’re lucky, women will allow them to buy them shit, console them when their boyfriends cheat on them while virtually tossing them into the embarrassing friendzone at the end of the day.
That’s the reward for being a nice guy who defend women, especially in disingenuous ways.
With all that being said, and armed with the knowledge that women are instinctively drawn to men who hold contrary points of views, I notoriously push back against male-bashing and other such anti-men rhetoric and talking-points that women are prone to spewing.
Granted I don’t just disagree with women for the sake of disagreement. Whenever I genuinely have a reason to disagree with women, I will state my case!
That is what Beta-Males don’t do. They conceal their true viewpoints in order to satisfy women. Hence why they are manipulative cowards in my opinion.
In any case, once you as a man show some backbone and are willing to push back against feminist rhetoric which are peddled by hordes of women, you will have managed to flip that attraction switch, simply from the demonstration of guts, spine, a backbone and a pair of nuts!
Over the last week since this tragic incident occurred, tons of females have inboxed me on Facebook: some telling me to go to hell, and others sharing with me their point of view on the fatal matter.
The most important takeaway though, is that they messaged!
Here is 1 such message from a random girl on island who had apparently caught wind of 1 of the many comments I made on numerous posts concerning the incident.
Now, clearly this girl is intrigued by my stance and Alphaness in going against the grain, and going against 99.9% of those who opined on the matter.
I could’ve gamed her up and picked her up, knowing that there exist some level of attraction to me (my stance). But I didn’t purse it…with this girl at least.
Here is another girl though, whom I’d pursued upon her message in relation to the incident. Remind you, she is also a random stranger who messaged me out of the blue, after replying to each other’s comments on a local-media outlet Facebook page on the fatal matter.
Pay keen attention to how I flipped this into a super-solid pull.
Again- bear in mind that this chick is a total stranger who seen my push-back comment on the tragic incident the other day which left a female dead from stab wounds caused by her boyfriend. There were also some voice notes circulating around, said to be from the boyfriend/assailant who’d gone into hiding since the incident. So the girl’s initial message below was hitting on that.
Screenshot 1: Now here’s the thing; I knew this girl liked my vibe and the fact that I go against the grain, and this is indicative of the fact that she messaged me to begin with. Remember: always assume attraction! Everything the girl does, always assume that she likes you. Hence, I strategically and smartly transitioned (changed the subject) immediately from the fatality to me and her. Never waste valuable time debating with a woman whom you want to shag! You run the risk of losing the girl by getting bogged down into a philosophical-based debate. So steer the conversation to you and her, as quickly as possible…just as I did! I knew she liked me, so I didn’t belabor the argument of the day.
BTW, I used a classic-neg tactic on her when I told her that her name is weird for a female, and that I thought she were a guy. How did she take the neg? She laughed…as expected. When you neg a girl correctly, her response is almost always laughter.
Screenshot 2: I further doubled down on the Neg when I asked if she were Australian because of her Australian-sounding name. She sent me a voice note with proper pronunciation of her name. I then sent a VN introducing myself with humor, to which she replied that I don’t sound like a local.
What she did afterwards was very telling of her attraction to me when she gave me her entire itinerary of the coming weekend, and that I should come join her.
I strategically played hard-to-get by telling her I’d get back to her about the details of whether I’ll be in her part of town come weekend. By doing this (“I’ll get back to you”), just as women do to men all the time, I demonstrate 2 things to her:
1.) I’m a busy guy hence important
2.) I’m not that desperate to just latch onto you and your offer
Screenshot 3: Although there’s no such thing as a girl being single, when she goes out of her way to explain how and why she’s single, it is a sure sign of her attraction and willingness to meet up. So bear that in mind: if a girl goes out of her way to breakdown why she’s single (which she’s not technically), then it’s an IOI (Indicator of Interest).
Why did I tell her that I like her straightforward vibe? First off, she wasn’t straightforward about anything really when she said that she’s single and goes out with her GF’s. There’s nothing there that should cause me to say that I like her straightforward attitude. So…why did I say it? Setting the frame that I like straightforward women because I’m a straightforward guy! I was indirectly giving her permission to be straight(forward), while simultaneously granting myself permission to be forward with, and without her consent. So what did I do in return? I got sexually forward with her by telling her that I don’t sugarcoat and that I want to fuck the intelligence out of her. 😈 I rambled on about her intelligence and how I find it fuck-worthy, to which she laughed about. And what was her response to me further being painfully honest? She said it’s good to be straightforward. 🙂
Moreover, I set this up also by using a classic seduction and NLP tactic called Cold Reading, when I said to her, “But I sense that u do like a guy who speaks his mind…”. If you’d done 30% of everything right up to that point (as I’d done: 100% 🙂 ), the girl will 99% of the time concur: that she does like guys who speak their minds. So that’s what happened there. So the girl subconsciously granted me permission and immunity to be sexually forward with her (without her knowledge).
She then went on to ask my age. Key note: if a girl actively seeks rapport (that is to ask you interview-type questions) on her own volition, it is almost always an attempt on her part to convey that she’s attracted to you.
Screenshot 4: Always try to answer her questions in jest, or outright evade her question. I chose to answer it with humor: sexual humor by saying I’m old enough to give her a spanking.
As usual, I strategically ended the conversation before the girl does! I preach this religiously, that the one who seeks to end the chat first, positions him or herself as the one having more value and importance. So that’s why I told her I’m gonna grab some food and message her back. I was essentially telling her sayonara. Whether you actually end the chat or not is irrelevant. It’s about who verbalizes it first (which I did).
Screenshot 5: I got more sexual by telling her I would check out “her eatable package” if I were taken to her hospital needing x-ray tests. She took a while to respond, but you notice that I didn’t send her another message saying, “what you doing”? That would’ve made me come off as rattled and unsure of myself. This could’ve been a ploy on her part, by purposely not replying to my message about her eatable package, just to see whether I would panic and go into chode mode by sending her 10 desperate messages, or send a genuine apology which would’ve been equally damning.
Anyways, sensing that I wouldn’t cave and go all desperate, she messaged me “GN”, and then gave a reason for her delay in replying.
In order to test out how eager she was to talk to me, I told her to “link me when she gets home then”. Had she said “okay”, it would’ve meant that she isn’t that sold on me YET. However, she made it quite clear that she was home, thus indeed super eager to touch base.
What did I do immediate afterwards, upon verification that she was super eager to engage me? I burst her bubble by saying “I’m gonna go grab a drink soon. Will hit u back up…”.
This technique is called “Push-Pull”. I gave her hope then took it away! She wanted to talk but I kept putting it off for later. This made her even more eager to latch on. So it’s all strategic on my part; including the girl’s. Just that my Game and strategery is way more solid than hers. 🙂 😉
Anyway, so in spite of me telling her that I’ll get back to her when I get to my destination (the bar). She couldn’t wait, so she hit me up saying that it seems like I’m drinking up a storm at the club. She came to this conclusion because she seen me posting statuses and pics from the bar.
Super strategic play on my part. I ignored her, blew her off by telling her “I’ll get back to you” but never got back to her. Yet I was @ the bar having fun, essentially forgetting that she existed. This fucks with a hot girl’s state and frame! No one does this to girls; especially a hot one! Which guy blatantly blows off a new girl who’s totally into him? Only a guy of higher value and perceived worth: such as a celeb, rockstar, athlete, millionaire, etc. I am none of those, yet I carry myself as one, and I also give off the vibe as though I am one of them. Hence, I made the girl chase me desperately for attention.
Screenshot 6: She mentioned that I look older than 34 and that I’m balding (which I am and never attempt to mask that). Why did she mention this? Congruence Test! She was testing me to see whether I were really an Alpha or a Beta-Male pretending in Alpha clothing. Women will always instinctively do this during the pickup, as a ploy to weed out the pretend Alpha-Males. So expect this! Expect her to say/do things in order to rattle your frame as a way for her to verify whether you’re real/sex-worthy or fake/non-sexy worthy loser. So that is essentially why she called me old(er) and made mention of my balding spot in the front with a receding hairline. The vast majority of men would’ve freaked the fuck out at that moment! They would’ve taken her comment (surely a neg) as an IOD (indication of disinterest), and subsequently got all insecure and self-conscious about their balding, age, weight, height, or whatever have you. But, as an Alpha-Male; those things don’t bother me, so I passed her congruence test with flying colors, by demonstrating that her negs and digs about me looking older and balding, don’t have a shred of an impact on my state/frame.
Moreover, whenever you pass a girl’s shit tests and congruence tests (as I did flawlessly), her pussy gets wetter for you! She begins to say to herself, “This muthafucker is the real deal”! Thus, your stock in her eyes quadruple, and her DTF-meter races to the max!
Be as it may, so I handled her shit test about me looking older by telling her that I am really 48 and balding, and that my pics were photoshopped. I am actually 34 and never lied about my age (upwards nor downwards). So, why did I do it here? Defiance! By raising my age, and embracing my balding, I communicate to the girl that I don’t give a fuck about her opinion of me. Hence the reason I passed her congruence testing in the first place. Women are subconsciously attracted to men who DGAF, and those who don’t seek to give women validation, nor suck up to women. So bear that in mind whenever faced with such inevitable occurrences along the pickup.
I also strategically and playfully feigned an argument when I told her that she thought I was 50. This was clearly humor that she understood.
How did this all resumed? I told her that I love her (playfully).
Screenshot 7: Always learn how to incorporate some hot and cold technique into your Game. I gave her shit, ignored her, etc. but I told her that I love her: hot and cold. Be nice then not so nice. Give her a range of emotions! Take her left then right! Throw her off! That is essentially what I was doing there.
Also, by telling her I have a girlfriend, it inspired a sense/fear of loss within her being. She now realizes that she has competition with my girlfriend. If you’re an average Joe who’s been dumbed-down by mainstream dating and everything else out there, you would’ve surmised that mere mention of a girlfriend would’ve been an automatic deal-breaker for any woman, and a rejection by any woman! However, as a master seductionist; I know better! I know that women will compete and scheme ways in order to wrestle away the attention of the Alpha from other women. And women will also compete in order to maximize their chances of mating with the Alpha-Male of the tribe! So that is why telling a girl that you have a girlfriend, will likely ignite her competitive spirit rather than dampen it.
Sensing that there was no more need to prolong this pull since the girl had already demonstrated that she was pliable, DTF and totally locked on, I asked which part of town (or the countryside) she lives.
Everything up to that point had all taken place on the Thursday: from opener (she inboxing me) to me asking her which part of town she lives.
I then discontinued the chat until she contacts me the next day (Friday) with “GN” (goodnight).
I totally blew her off the entire Friday (just to deepen the sense of loss while deepening the attraction), then elected to contact her the Saturday in order to grab her phone number…which I successfully secured…as I always do whenever I go for it.
Okay, so what are the major takeaways here if you’re a guy reading this?
There are many as cited throughout the post. However, I just want to solidly my original point about women being attracted to guys who have their own opinions and ideals about things.
As a man, women look to you to lead verbally and physically. Not having the guts to defend what you believe in is a sure turnoff. Following the masses like a mindless android chugging along with the rest of us, is likewise a turnoff.
Online, and certainly outside the confines of the internet, most men don’t possess the cojones to go against what women and society at large, consider normally acceptable.
It’s much palatable and safe to play get along, even in the face of staunch opposition of your core ideals as an individual.
Most of us actively and disingenuously look to side with the majority point of view because it’s safer [ditto men on social media]. Does the old idiom of “there’s safety in numbers” ring a bell?
I mean, this quasi-survival strategy is all fine and dandy on the battle field. But it’s a failing strategy when trying to attract women and get laid.
A great example of playing get along like a mindless robot to no avail, is the guy online who comments oft-generic compliments such as, “You’re so beautiful”, under the delusion that if he only recites what every halfway-cute girl has heard all day, he will have captivated the girl’s attention.
Coupled with that, you have the spineless wuss-bags who virtually align themselves with every point of view put out there by women. I’d already touches on these types extensively at the top of the article, so I’ll spare you an encore bashing…for now at least.
Lastly, I want to wrap up this post on the topic of Assumed Attraction, or always assuming that it’s ON, by taking nothing a woman do as mere happenstance.
As is the case with the co-protagonist spoken of in this article, I didn’t merely take her out-of-the-blue message to mean that she truly gave a fuck about giving me clarification on a recently tragic-murder case. Whether she truly wanted to make me see the light on the matter: it doesn’t fucking matter to me!
I assume attraction!
I make the assumption that she really wants to fuck me, but she’s just too bashful to be forthcoming in stating her case. 🙂 🙂
Now- on another level- this may very well had been the case! And I’ll go out on a limb to say just that: that she wanted to fuck me, so she reached out to me (indirectly so) in order to get my attention.
I mean, look at it this way; how many girls are randomly messaging complete strangers just to get their point across on any given matter?
Absolutely none I would guesstimate.
Women frankly don’t give enough fucks to want to care about which kiss-ass chode does or doesn’t fancy her or her opinions!
My approach on the other hand, being that I demonstrated boldness through my comments (in defiance of general opinion), I managed to flip the attraction switch without actually doing a thing besides stating my opinion on the argument of the day.
Okay, so lemme not digress any longer. So, just as I did with this girl, I want you to assume that it’s always ON, and your default position is that the girl wants to rip your clothes off!
Make her have to prove to you that this isn’t the case, that she doesn’t want to fuck you!
Therefore, always assume attraction from any little thing that the girl does.
If she messages you at random, or she happens to get back to you upon a promise made: assume that she’s into you!
She comments on 1 of your Facebook posts, or merely hits like: assume she wants to fuck you!
She hits like on your pic upload, or wishes you HBD: assume she wants to fuck you!
If she gives you a sweeping glance from across the bar: assume attraction!
If she says hello to you under any circumstance: make the assumption that she did so in order to get your attention!
You get the picture, right?
That should be your default frame: everything the girl does in connection to you, translates to attraction and her wanting you to hammer her guts out.
With that (the assumption frame and assuming that it’s always ON), what do you do from there?
Game the girl as you normally would any other girl whom you know for certain fancies you.
What is the absolute worse that could happen if you get this wrong (your assumption that the girl wants you turns out to be wrong)?
Three things (in no order of probability):
1.) The girl tells you that she isn’t into you in that way, nor at all, so she politely rejects you.
2.) She tells you to fuck off!
3.) She blocks you (if this is via the internet)
4.) She walks away (if this is in the club or bar)
The absolute worse that would happen in the event that you got it wrong!
Would that hurt you in any way?
Of course not!
On that note: capitalize off of every opportunity to get the girl by taking everything she does in relation to you, as a sign of her interest in you!
You have nothing to lose by adopting such an entitled and confident frame/mindset!
With this girl, whether or when I’ll actually try to meet up with her, depends on a matter of allocation of time and girls, as is the case with every girl I pick up.
More kick-ass and instructional articles to come shortly. And please share these posts just to get the word out there.
I’ll appreciate it!