What an article to publish on Christmas huh? Sure to ruffle Santa’s beard a little.
Ok, since attaining adulthood, I’ve always been an AIDS skeptic and denialist; a position which was probably influenced by the fact that I’m a conspiracy theorist.
Aside from the government-conspiracy angle, the populace (globally) needs to realize that the HIV and AIDS have been debunked by scientists, microbiologists, pathologists, chemists and other reputable sources over the years.
Let’s look at the political aspect to HIV & AIDS.
The greater a state’s AIDS count, the more funding and money that state receives from the FED.
With this being the reality, many states would rig their HIV-AIDS count in order to get AIDS money from the FEDS, which none of it was going towards AIDS research neither towards HIV-positive patients.
That is the political angle on a state by state basis in the U.S. Rigging the AIDS count was a way to get more money.
Also, let’s take into account the global and political structure on the matter.
HIV: The Human Immuno-deficiency Virus. The term in itself usually flies over the head of the average individual since not all of us are familiarized with the coded terminology. To simplify the term HIV, it’s a virus which attacks the immune system of those who have a deficient or weak immune system. The immune system is responsible for fighting off foreign agents (as viruses) and keeping your ass alive.
That is simply what defines a Human Immune-Deficiency Virus in layman’s term: a living organism (virus) which invades the bodies of individuals whose defenses are weak.
Simple! That is the so-called mission, purpose and job of HIV or any virus.
Where am I going with this?
Bear in mind the simplified definition of HIV and what it does.
Now, some of us are familiar with the saying: “No one dies of AIDS. We die from other common diseases and viruses which are present in the body at the time”.
What that simply means is, if you were diagnosed as HIV positive or having AIDS, if you happen to die along your treatment, you in fact did NOT die from HIV but a simple common cold, pneumonia, flu, malaria, etc. most likely was the culprit in the death.
Therefore, HIV doesn’t cause death, but other viruses, infectious conditions, diseases, etc.
Now here is where I’m heading: Poverty.
Poverty leads to immune deficiency- PERIOD!
Not to go too deep with the scientific jargon, but bear in mind what I cited earlier that “Immune Deficiency” simply applies to “People or Someone” for whatever reason, has a “Weak” or “Poor” bodily defense.
Poverty goes hand in hand with “Weak” and “Deficient” systems.
If you’re malnourished, your system/body/defenses would’ve been weakened or deficient.
If you have little to no access to drinking water (clean that it), your system/body/defenses would’ve been weakened or deficient.
If your body/system haven’t gotten its essential intake of whatever it needs to stay alive healthily [be it protein, vitamins, iron, etc.], you are essentially deemed “Deficient” and “Weakened”, since your immune system isn’t being supplied with what it needs to do its job.
Saying all that to say, the so-called reason why HIV and AIDS is so rampant in third-word nations, is due to improper nourishment and inadequate supplies for the body and daily functions, poor sanitation, etc.
Therefore, regions such as Africa, India, parts of Asia, and nations such as Haiti are hot spots for malnutrition which they deem as HIV and AIDS.
On the contrary, in regions and nations where you have access to fresh water, proper nutrition, etc. the so-called AIDS virus isn’t as rampant nor an epidemic.
Therefore, poverty leads to HIV and AIDS (from that standpoint).
However, there’s a trick and twist to this. Having a poor diet (poverty) leads to a deficient-immune system (HIV).
We understand that (at least I hope you do).
This isn’t rocket-science neither because we all can agree that having a poor diet (physical poverty) leads to many bodily ailments and dysfunctions such as: acne, constipation, diarrhea, erectile dysfunction, arthritis, death, etc.
Virtually every sickness we get as humans is attributed to poor diet, bad food and what we consume.
Thus the same with HIV, it’s readily acquired in regions, nations and cities where poverty is rampant and high.
The twist is, and this has been confirmed by many sources, almost all of the cases in Africa and other such regions where HIV is deemed rampant, those people who are dying are NOT dying from HIV and AIDS!
They are dying from sheer fucking malnutrition!
Not HIV! But a lack of food, lack of uncontaminated water, lack of cleanliness in certain environments such as places in India.
It’s no coincidence that places like these in India which resemble sewages, are prime areas of poverty, malnutrition and ailments.
The former president of Iran, Mahmud Ahmadenejad, said it best, that if only less than a quarter of the wealthy nations in the world help battle poverty, AIDS would be nonexistent [since poverty breeds what they consider HIV-AIDS].
What the WHO (World Health Organization) and the UN won’t tell you, is that they wantonly and blindly label these regions as HIV and AIDS hot spots, not via confirmed testing but merely looking at symptoms in sick patients.
In other words, if I’m living in South Africa, and for whatever reason, my immune system is weakened and deficient, and I happen to see a doctor about it, he has a quasi mandate based on his prescribe script to label me as having HIV and AIDS, merely because my immune system is in a lowered state, or because I complained of unusual-weight loss and so forth.
Not because he had tested me and gotten conclusive evidence. But from sheer guess-timation based on symptoms, how often I eat, the area in which I live and so forth.
Hence, most cases in which they deem someone as having HIV and AIDS, that person could simply be showing symptoms of another virus (like the flu) or haven’t eaten a balanced meal in a while.
Now, I can imagine the following question being asked: “But what accounts for the cases in America where virtually everyone has access to clean water…yet they still contract HIV and AIDS [Magic Johnson for instance].
First answer to that is, America is very poverty stricken, but the government will never admit to this, solely to uphold the myth that America is paradise and has no correlative issues to that of so-called poor nations.
The truth is: a huge number of the American populace is poor and in poverty: no drinkable water but contaminated), malnutrition, underfed, etc.
With that, such areas, cities and neighborhoods in America are prime breeding grounds to be labeled as high risk for HIV and AIDS.
Personally, I’ve taken 6 AIDS tests over the past 10 years, 3 over the past 4 years.
That’s pretty high being that the average person doesn’t take any at all [and I don’t blame anyone for not taking any].
Mines were sorta mandatory due to the nature of work I did. My last testing however was voluntary as my girlfriend kept fucking bugging me about it!
Speaking from experience, accompanying the testing is a questionnaire you’ll have to fill out, including a verbal interrogation by the AIDS secretariat. I’m assuming this’ protocol worldwide [and it is].
My question is, and this has been posed by other skeptics [MSNBC actually ran a segment on this years ago]: “why the fuck should I or anyone for that matter, have to answer specific questions related to our sex lives and social activities”?
Isn’t that suspect?
Why should what I do or how many girls I’d screwed factor into an AIDS test?
Does that mean the more girls I sleep with, the higher the risk of contracting HIV and AIDS? And if I were to have only slept with 1 woman o 1 occasion in my life, does it mean a lesser chance of getting it?
Sounds logical but let’s examine this.
The reason you’re asked these so-called protocol questions is for them to determine whether you have AIDS or not!
It’s also fucking laughable when you think of how inane the methodology!
Why should they have to ask you any question at all to determine anything!?
No pun intended, however this sort of reminds me of psychic networks who you can call up to get a reading over the phone. But if you’re psychic; why the hell are you asking for my name, age, sex, date of birth, etc. Shouldn’t you be telling me…since you’re psychic? 😉
Sticking to the script, so the questionnaire plays right into the HIV and AIDS myth as far as the accepted narrative that one catches (mainly) the virus from having unprotected sex.
When having an HIV testing, these are some of the questions they may ask [they did ask me all of the following but not in the actual order]:
* How many sexual partners have you had?
* Are you sexual active?
* Ever had sex before?
* Would you say you had many partners or few?
* Do you drink?
* Do you smoke?
* How often do you smoke?
* What’s your race?
* Where do you live?
* Have you ever traveled to Africa or other such region?
* Are you heterosexual?
* Ever had gay sex?
Now ask yourself, what the fuck is that for!?
I simply want to know if I’m HIV positive or negative!!!
Why should those questions factor into the result?
If so: why do they?
Now the beauty is, if you were to ask those questions [the whys] of the person conducting the testing, he or she will gladly (ignorantly) say to you:
“Of course those questions will help determine whether you’re positive or negative”! 😯
Guys, that is a frightening fucking confession!!!
What they’re actually saying is, you can be a totally healthy person, never shared needles to shoot up drugs, never had sexual intercourse (a virgin), but the mere fact that you’d traveled to Mumbai and that you have a few gay friends, will actually swing the pendulum towards HIV POSITIVE!
In other words (and in fact), the pathologists are NOT reading your t- cell count to determine whether your immune system is deficient or not and whether to definitively say that you have the virus.
What they’re actually doing and telling you straight up, is they’re determining whether you have the virus based on your answers in the written and verbal questionnaire [this also answers why you can get your results within minutes since they’re no laboratory work done]!
Therefore, even if your system does NOT register as having HIV, they can and will deem you as having it solely based on your race, lifestyle, sexuality, to where you’d traveled, alcohol consumptions, etc.
That is fucking scary!!!
Which now makes complete sense as to why you’re being asked those questions prior to taking the examination.
Couldn’t they determine whether you’re HIV positive or negative without supplying those answers?
Why the fuck not!?
In fact, they will not even administer you the voluntary testing if you hadn’t first answered the required questions.
Am I the only one to see a grave conspiracy here?
Now, to put this into perspective, let’s do a virtual case study of 2 American males just to paint a clearer picture of how they determine who has AIDS or not.
We’ll call them Kenny & Ron.
Kenny is Afro-American: Ron is white.
* How many sexual partners have you had? 3
* Are you sexual active currently? No
* Ever had sex before? Yes
* Would you say you had many partners or few? Few
* Do you drink? No. Never.
* Do you smoke? Never.
* How often do you smoke? Never.
* What’s your race? Black.
* Where do you live? South Bronx
* Have you ever traveled to Africa or other such regions? No.
* Are you heterosexual? Yes.
* Ever had gay sex? No.
Now, Kenny’s answers appear GREAT for someone who’d be HIV negative.
Let’s look at Ron’s questionnaire:
* How many sexual partners? 40
* Are you sexual active? Yes. Very
* Ever had sex before? Yes!
* Would you say you had many partners or few? Many
* Do you drink? Yes
* Do you smoke? Yes
* How often do you smoke? Often
* What’s your race? Caucasian
* Where do you live? Nassau county, Long Island
* Have you ever traveled to Africa or other such regions? Yes
* Are you heterosexual? Yes
* Ever had gay sex? Yes. twice.
Now Ron has many red flags: lots of sexual partners, had gay sex, traveled to Africa, etc.
Of the 2 individuals, guess which 1 will most likely be deemed HIV Positive [if there had to be one]?
Kenny, the black guy, although his questionnaire was virtually blemish-free. 😯
Kenny comes from a so-called high risk group [he’s black] and lives in a so-called high risk area [South Bronx]. Though medically and in truth, he does NOT have the virus, he will still more likely to be deemed Positive while Ron, the white guy who had all the red flags, would be deemed Negative, solely because he’s of a racial group which is deemed low risk [caucasian], and he also lives in a community [Long Island] which is deemed low risk in comparison to the Bronx.
Your social status, race and geographic location are what determine whether you’ll be HIV positive or negative.
Hypothetically, let’s assuming Kenny & Ron are both black or both white, they [the AIDS secretariat] will have to highlight other factors (from the questionnaire) to determine which is positive or negative since race cannot be a factor if both are of the same race. So they may take into account who’d fucked the most girls or shot up the most heroine or lives nearer to urban areas.
It’s all political, economical, racial, geographical and most of all diabolical.
The W.H.O. [World Health Organization] in conjunction with UNICEF, NATO and the F.D.A. (of the United States), has a quota of how many individuals they will deem HIV positive or negative per annum (yearly), from which racial stock and region of the globe.
Therefore, you as a healthy individual who decides to take an HIV testing out of sheer curiosity to “know your status”, little do you know, a quota has already been established which will determine whether you will fall into the positive or negative bracket, even if you actually have the virus or not.
Therefore, an HIV positive individual can be labeled negative simply because he wasn’t the lucky #15 or something as trivial as that.
It’s sheer luck and a numbers game. Let’s call it a lottery or draft. The 5th. person who comes in today to undergo an AIDS testing, will be deemed suspect and must be intensely scrutinized and determined HIV positive!
That’s all it is sonny!
They play a virtual lottery with the AIDS crap!
They conclude that you’re HIV positive without a shred of (medical) evidence to show besides a quota and questionnaire…which aren’t evidence.
“Am Positive Here But Negative There”?
Another huge discrepancy in the HIV and AIDS narrative, are numerous accounts where persons have been positive in this 1 country, but negative in another, and vice versa.
In fact, this usually happens within the same nation of testing.
There was a case of a guy in South Africa who tested positive in 1 clinic but negative a few days later at a roadside makeshift medical testing place.
Such stories are common!
Why does this occur?
What the average person isn’t aware of, is that there are 3 or so sanctioned-governing bodies around the globe which jockey for the monopoly on whose HIV-AIDS testing criterion should be followed.
Therefore, if you’re in the USA, majority of testing done there might fall under the Gallo’s model of AIDS testing.
If you’re in Argentina, a different body of the 3 might have the monopoly.
Now, if I take an AIDS test in Argentina and the questionnaire sequence that they follow, determines that I’m HIV Positive, and I take a separate test in America, there’s a strong chance of the results contradicting the first result.
So according to the AIDS proponent community, you can be positive in Canada but negative in Haiti, depended on which of the 3-4 bodies govern the testing in that clinic or region. Or frankly depended on which testing method the doctor prefers or that the AIDS secretariat suggests.
All the while, you’re functioning as normal as possible, no symptoms of the HIV virus. But because of the stigma and the psychological factor, you begin to retreat into a life of exile, not eating (correctly), rapidly losing weight, mind-state depletion, stress, depression, unable to find a sexual partner…now you are really fucking sick as your immune system would’ve gotten weakened and deficient.
At this point, you’re cajoled into treatment with a so-called AIDS medication [AZT: Azidothymidine], which in fact, is what will causes you to deteriorate even more rapidly than the result of a stressful state.
Remember what I said earlier [not my original quote]: “HIV-AIDS does NOT kill you, but you die from any ordinary sickness you might have gotten…”
In your current state of being vaccinated, stressed to the point of losing weight and unable to eat, your immune system would have been weakened, which means your body is unable to fight off foreign agents, then you catch a flu or pneumonia. That flu or pneumonia will be the actual cause of your death (medically)…even though the drug treatment was the actual cause, but that info cannot be circulated due to politics.
Hence, the HIV or AIDS virus was NOT the cause of death (a virus which never existed, at least not in your body in the first place).
The medical treatment that they administer you are actually what helps to accelerate your death. Not to nurse you back to good health!
This is also why there would never be a so-called cure for the so-called AIDS virus: it’s too profitable for pharmaceutical companies.
The only how they would come up with a cure, is if they create a new virus bogeyman in which they can profit off of just as they do from HIV-AIDS.
It’s all a business. Just as the condom industry is a lucrative business getting rich off of our fears of the AIDS bogeyman.
Do you really think that anyone or any industry that profits here is rooting for an AIDS cure?
No One Catches HIV-AIDS From Unprotected Sex
The biggest bullshit sold to us as of the late is if you don’t wear a condom you may catch AIDS and subsequently die!
The average person is so ignorant and media-compliant that he’ll actually believe this without semi-concrete evidence.
A study was done some years back in the states by a scientific-research group, who documented the lives of HIV positive individuals in sexual relationships with others who didn’t have HIV-AIDS.
The group took their findings to numerous AIDS organizations with the question of:
“Why haven’t the persons who were HIV negative contracted the virus from having years worth of unprotected sex with someone who has the virus”?
“What accounts for this”?
They [the AIDS advocacy organization] were then forced to admit that there is ZERO proof that one can contract the HIV virus from unprotected sex. And there has never been a documented case of someone contracting AIDS via unprotected sex from another person.
Then how are people catching AIDS like it’s going out of style all around the globe?
Just to shed some light on the ignorance of the average dumbed-down individual, an independent group had conducted some random-street interviews where they asked individuals: “How many times do you think someone has to have unprotected sex with an AIDS infected person to catch the virus”?
Ninety percent of those questioned said: “1 time only”!
“You have unprotected sex with someone who has HIV: you will catch it right away”.
The remaining 10% said about 3-5 times.
To add to this, for all we know, we all have had unprotected sex at some point in our lives with someone who was HIV positive.
Prior to 2009 [the year in which I’d slept with the most women in my entire life; all unprotected], I’d only used a condom perhaps once: 1 time, in my entire life! Being a Pick-Up Artist who had slept with innumerable amounts of women without wearing a condom (but once), not to mention that 90% of the women I slept with were of African decent (so-called high risk group), I would imagine I would’ve been prime target #1, don’t you think?
However, all 6 of my HIV-AIDS results came back Negative.
If I’m not catching the virus, then who the fuck is!?
Is it the guy who had only had 2 sexual partners, all of which times he had worn a condom?
AZT (Azidothymidine) The Deadly AIDS Virus Medication Which Is Responsible For Deaths Deemed By AIDS
There was a well-known documented case of 11 HIV-positive women who had banded together as a group, sort of to support one another through their trial [research Christine Maggiore].
Of the 11 women, 3 of them were NOT on the AZT treatment (by sheer chance).
The 9 who were taking treatment with the so-called retro-viral AIDS drug, had all died shortly after [within 9 months].
Being ignorant of the death-drug which was actually causing the AIDS deaths, in the mid 1980’s, gay-infected communities throughout America rallied and protested for the FDA to approve the AZT drug, not knowing that the drug was the actual cause of death.
Congress was lobbied and approved, all the HIV-positive gays, who were by the way, living normal healthy lives prior to taking the drug, consumed AZT by the truck loads: and they all perished in crippling fashion within weeks, months to less than 4 years later!
The main side effect of the AZT drug is severe loss of appetite. This accounts for the massive weight loss in so-called AIDS patients. The drug was actually causing the weight loss, and NOT the non-existing HIV-AIDS virus bogeyman.
Hence, those grotesque photos and videos we all were shown at school, were strictly the results of the AZT drugs that the patients were taking, and NOT from any virus!
This is why no one really noticed that the drug was actually the problem until they investigated the so-called HIV-positive individuals who were NOT on the treatment…yet were living normal as normal gets.
Protester demanding AZT, unknowing that this same drug will be the cause of death
According to Dr. Peter Duesberg, a highly regarded molecular-cell biologist at the University of California, Berkeley, “AZT is AIDS by prescription. The AZT drug is the real AIDS virus”.
Those who were fortunate enough to be taken off of AZT, their weight had regained to a normal count, and other so-called HIV symptoms had vanished.
On a related note, countless studies also show that individuals who unknowingly had HIV-AIDS, and were never tested for it, went on to live a normal-healthy life, had healthy kids, died at a usual age…yet had tested positive after the fact (death) and found to have the HIV virus in their bodies.
The point I’m making here is, the governing bodies bank on once they inform you that you’re HIV positive, you emotionally, psychologically and physically breakdown, seek treatment and die!!!
This is the case often times.
However the odd cases where HIV-Positive persons are in denial and refuse to get treatment in spite of the proverbial-death sentence; they go on to live a normal fucking life!
It’s only when you “Believe” that you have a looming-death sentence (AIDS) and you begin to take their poisonous vaccines, it is only then that you die!
But if you tell them “Fuck off with the AIDS talk and fuck the treatment”, you go on to live a normal life with healthy kids…who are HIV free.
Therefore, those AIDS organizations bank on you believing that you only have 2 years to live if you don’t get treatment immediately.
Now if you’re HIV negative yet due to the questionnaire, they had to have diagnosed you positive, and there are doctors and counselors constantly telling you that you have weeks and months to live, why the fuck would you adhere to a healthy die? Why would you even eat? You’re gonna die in weeks anyway! Why would you worry about counting calories and carb intake when you’re gonna die in months!?
With that being the case, a once healthy person would’ve became severely malnourished, lost 100 lbs. in no time from loss of appetite due to stress from a looming-death sentence he or she was prescribed…
That is the true narrative.
On another note, am I advocating unprotected sex?
If you’re a guy who isn’t prone to pulling out in order to avoid unwanted pregnancy: then sure- use protection!
However, if you’re wearing a condom with the preconceived notion that you’re protecting yourself from AIDS or somehow protecting the world from AIDS; I want to be the first to tell you that you’re a fucking idiot!
Not only will you NOT catch the bogeyman of a virus if you don’t wear condoms, but even if you do religious wear them, that still won’t determine your status after you would’ve gotten tested.
Personally, I don’t wear condoms with my intimate-sexual partners. If it’s a One-Night Stand and the girl insists: then I’ll wear 1 just to avoid the frame battle. But I’m no fan of condoms.
Your decision to buy into the HIV-AIDS narrative is your fucking business.
I can care less who wears condoms and who fuck raw dog.
My job is solely to bring the unadulterated truth, that all these diseases, wars and pestilence are strictly about money, power, deliberate genocide and population control.
Poverty leads to premature deaths and other diseases- PERIOD!
Virtually all of the reported AIDS cases in the so-called under developed world, are linked to malnutrition: a lack of food.
With that, a doctor in Johannesburg, South Africa, who’s dealing with malnutrition patients, will likely diagnose them as dying from AIDS, without running tests as evidence, but by deeming malnutrition as a symptom of HIV-AIDS.
Hence, those people living in poverty-stricken countries are often misdiagnosed as suffering from AIDS, when in fact, the culprit is no water, no food and common ailments.
Has nothing to do with HIV and AIDS but a lack of education of what they say AIDS is, its functions, symptoms, and even if it exists at all (which it doesn’t…not in the way in which they claim).
Who wants to believe this as mere conspiracy can simply fuck off.
I’m just here to disturb the peace with the truth.
Enjoy the holiday [although I don’t celebrate Christmas]!